I'm thinking of some people which judges these things as the biggest pollution maker.
Hmmm... Alright, the CO emmissions from these things are really bad.
But, which are worse? These things? or THIS?
Which causes the pollution?
Because the CO gas from cars, can be fertilized by plants and trees.
What these trees transform to?
OUR TEST PAPERS, OUR BOOKS, OUR WORK SHEET, and everything which comes from papers.
What happened if 1 book need 1 tree to cut?
so to produce 100 books, needs to cut more than 100 trees, what a pity.
And remember, the cars are still useful.
What do you use to transport from one place to another? cars
Who do you call if you see anyone get an accident? ambulance, and ambulance is a car.
Who do you call if you see someone rob the bank? the cops, and they get there fast by cars, not bicycles, or motorcycles.
What thing accompanies you anywhere? your cars
So if you want to judge them as the "pollution maker", think twice. Get real, you can't do anything without cars in this sick country.
And remember, cars sold now had passed the emmission-check. which means, you don't need to worry with the environment. The minimum standard of emmission in this country is euro2, but some cars, have passed euro4, or even euro5, the very-hard-to-pass emmission regulation in countries of europe.
Also, some car manufacturers developed the hybrid engines, fuel cells, electrics, diesels, etc, which are more eco-friendly for the future. Just ask Google, and it'll tell u more about these eco-friendly vehicles.
The main suspect is still the unresponsible people who cuts the trees, not the car manufacturers. If the trees keep planted, i believe, the CO emmission from the cars can be reduced.
And i've got a funny-but-it's-right quote from some friends :
"Yes, money can't buy happiness, but it's more comfortable to cry in a Mercedes than on a bicycle"
Me, as a car freak, would like to say : life will be empty without those large-stuff in your garage.
